Psychoanalytic Perspectives of the Oedipus Mythology Essay

Patricide and incest underframe the thesis and heart and soul that Sophocles began with the creation of Oedipus the King. In the head for the hillss that followed, Oedipus at Colonus and Antigone, Sophocles expounded upon what would give-up the ghost one of the most threatening archetypes in psychoanalysis. To best interpret the Oedipus trilogy, a look will be deportn into the construction of the defrauds themselves, followed by an interpretation of the nobbles collimates and the inception of the Oedipus Complex based upon a psychoanalytic perspective.To take with, Sophocles wrote what became known as the Oedipus trilogy e reallyplace a period of more than cardinal years which indicates the profound immersion that he plainly had in the Oedipus saga. severally play is a collected chronicle representing his dramatic foundation of buyback from the sin of patricide and incest, and yet, the arch between the terzetto Theban plays sidle ups the message that Sophocles refu sed to deliver himself from, and which consumed nearly his entire liveliness.While this may seem of poor splendor to reading the Oedipus trilogy itself, Sophocles did not write them in the order represented in nearly every anthology. As David Grene notes, as far as the fabrication is concerned, the story runs in sequence Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, Antigone (p. i). Their order of conception, instead, went Antigone, Oedipus the King, and then Oedipus at Colonus (p. i), which presents a few inaccuracies indoors the story itself ( importantly with the character and actions of Creon, Jocastas brother).From this family order, the series, thitherfore, cannot have formed a true or literal trilogybeyond the situation that distri exactlyively of the three plays deals with the situation in the Oedipodean family history, there is no unity of musical composition or treatment between them (Watling). Moreover, except for the obvious links of fact connecting them, each constit utes a fresh approach to a distinct and self-contained problem (13).Roughly, this means that while most anthologies present the three Theban plays in a chronological order for the character Oedipus, the fact stay that each could be read with off knowledge of the others and the same theme and message would be receivedwhich, based upon Sophocles life-long obsession with the story, must have been his plea for the story that kept evolving. The reasoning behind the order and placement of the plays within anthologies is sound, however, because, while the stories may be self-contained, the arch of Oedipus is the link that literally turns the plays into a trilogy.In Oedipus the King, Oedipus, as prophecy had predicted, kills his receive, King Laius, and marries his mother, Queen Jocasta, bearing at least four children in the process who, in the play Antigone, argon revealed as Antigone, Ismene, Eteocles, and Polyneices. After learning of his horrible actions, Oedipus exiles himself as he had proclaimed would be the fate of the brute capable of murdering King Laius, and subsequently blinds himself in the hopes of finding redemption for his unforgivable sins. While Oedipus at Colonus is the second play in the anthologies, it is the literal ending for Oedipus.He is taken to the metropolis of Colonus by his loving daughters, Antigone and Ismene, because, as he had learned from the oracle in Oedipus the King, he was meant to find his lowest resting place there. Moments before his end, Oedipus realizes that his sins of patricide and incest werent truly yucky because he committed the acts out of ignorance alone, and it is in this moment, and despite everything he has go well-nigh in his quest for redemption that Zeus absolves Oedipus of his sins and he passes, with peace, into the afterlife.In Antigone, Oedipus is little more than a plot reference to get the play started. His solely mention is in the opening lines and is that, following his self-imposed exile from th e urban center of Thebes in Oedipus the King, Oedipus had made a prediction that his sons would be arrogant tolerable to fight over his throne and kill each other. Thus the play begins with the deaths of Eteocles and Polyneices. The play itself follows the actions of Antigone and her husband Creon, who is the cause for a good deal speculation from most scholars collectible to his not-so advanced age.As the timeline goes, Creon is Jocastas brother and would have been Oedipus senior by m whatever years or, at the very least, would have been as older as Oedipus himself. As Antigone is Oedipus daughter, and Creon is said to be a vigorous middle-aged puzzle of a youthful son (Watling, 13), scholars debate as to the true statement of Sophocles character creation and question as to his motives in retelling the story in as m each forms as he did, with an outstanding flaw.Creons expiration notwithstanding, it is the minor and in hu homo-shattering role of Oedipus in the play Antigon e that marks the main reason that most anthologies place Antigone last in the order of the Oedipus mythology, rase though the timeline would, as Sophocles thought in writing them, place Oedipus at Colonus last, due to the plays depiction of the last days of Oedipus life. This, in itself, is significant in understanding the psychological aspects of the Oedipus trilogy.Now, while readers will never know the true meaning behind the order of the Oedipus mythology, the fact ashes that Sophocles wrote within an archetype and character arch with the intentions of presenting his dramatic themeand it took three tries to get it out as he desired. What he created, however, demonstrates a verity about the self-discovery of the individual and the path to redemption that marks a significant aspect of the growth of the human being.To best arrange this journey, a psychoanalytic perspective will now be taken into Sophocles main theme and message. From an analysis of his work, Sophocles shargons a concern with finding trueness in a world of appearances and is influenced, unconstipated if in postly, by the new theories about language the problem of the congenator of words to reality, and the baron of words to deceive, to win unjust causes, and to confuse virtuous issues (Segal, 7).More, the plays argon almost surely a response to events of his period. An unexpected, supernatural-seeming disaster dead sweeps away brilliant hopes confidence in human reason and calculation is shattered, and greatness swiftly turns into misery (9). Sophocles saw the rise and fall of powerful nations, and it makes sense that he would take what he had seen and created his rendition of events that had transpired in a literary form that he could show the world.And it is from this infrastructure that scholars have debated over the purpose and parallels behind the twain main cities present within the plays of Sophocles. Often, the city of Athens is compared to a mans relationship with himsel f, whereas the city of Thebes represents the difference between man and his sustain. Indeed, the figure of Oedipus is a distillation of Athens at the height of its power, energy, daring, intellectual curiosity, and confidence in human reason (Segal, 11).As the historical context of the city of Athens was surely an influence in Sophocles making of the Oedipus trilogy, a direct parallel from the closing of Athens to the destruction of Oedipus the powerful leader can be skeletal. More, it is even possible that Oedipus hunt for who he really is reflects something of a communal identity crisis in a city that had undergone a massive transformation in a misfortunate time and had refashioned itself from a rather quiet, traditional aristocracy and tyranny in the sixth century into a radical, intellectualized democracy and a powerful empire (Segal, 11).This parallel, of Oedipus to the grand city of Athens, does much to lend weight to Sophocles theme of mint and the gods marking a path for man. For, as Athens rose in power, so too, it fell because it committed sins and transgressions to great to find redemption from along the way. As for the city of Thebes, there lies a direct correlation to Sigmund Freuds possibleness of conflict between man and his father which represents a direct parallel to Oedipus exile from the city of his king-making.Freud suggested that the play fascinates us so muchnot because it dramatizes the contrast between destiny and human will, but because there must be something which makes a voice within us nimble to recognize the compelling force of destiny (Segal, 59). From this theory, Freud defined that the destiny is the frequent necessity to which all of us (or at least all males) are subjectnamely, the wishes that remain from our buried animal nature to kill the father and possess the mother (59).And it is this destiny upon which Sophocles created his foundation and archetype. As a basis for his theory, Freud determined that the oracle was a direct parallel to the unconscious principal, citing that this disguising of Oedipus unconscious mind desires in the form of an oracle from the gods not only lets the unconscious induce visible but also accounts for the feeling of guilt that we have about these unconscious desires, even though we are not guilty of any crime (Segal 59-60).Even more, Freud speculated that Oedipus eagerness to punish himself, with no attempt at self-defense, corresponds to the inner conviction of guilt that stems from these unconscious desires (60). Because Oedipus immediately set out to punish himself and find redemption for his actions, despite the fact that he did them in ignorance, then, suggests that in his subconscious, Oedipus did indeed have desires to kill his father and physically and sexually possess his mother.For, as Freud theorized, in his actions following his revelation, Oedipus confessed his own guilt. If, perhaps, Oedipus had sought to affirm himself on the basis that he di dnt know his father and certainly had no affections for his mother, having grown up the adoptive son of another, the theme may then have been interpreted differently. However, as Freud was so certain, there is much to be said about the actions of Oedipus in correlation to the guilt he felt.The subconscious mind had a profound impact on Oedipus, even though he knew nothing of the birth parents he was prophesized to destroy. For Freud, the archetypal constructs of the Oedipus mythology was so absolute that he dubbed it the Oedipus Complexwhich denotes each persons attitudes and way in his or her most intimate family relationships, especially to mother and fatherand, to mature into a normal adult, the child must somehow come to legal injury with the residue of repressed infantile hatred and desire for his or her parents (Segal, 60).The Oedipus Complex, in modern psychology, is applied to the study of actions in relation to the subconscious desires that hold up in every child. Even m ore, Freuds theory has become leafy vegetable in the vernacular of psychology to the extent that scholars use the term, perhaps, without even avaricious the wax meaning behind the cleverly, yet aptly, named psychosis. The Oedipus Complex is based upon two main ideals that of the matricentric relationship to the child and the patriarchal relationship. The two are separated by this relationship and define the growth and development of the child.Moreover, matriarchal culture is characterized by the emphasis on ties of blood, ties to the soil and the passive espousal of all natural phenomenawhile a patriarchal society in contrast is characterized by respect for man-made law, by the predominance of rational thought and by the effort to change natural phenomena by man (Armens, viii). To better define the difference, in the matriarchal concept all men are relate since they are all the children of mothers and each one a child of nonplus Earth.A mother loves her children all alike and without (limiting) conditionsthe aim of life is the merriment of man and there is nothing more important or self-respectful than human existence and life (viii). In this, to draw a parallel back to Oedipus, the child has (whether he realizes or understands it) a desire to be with the muliebrity who created him because of her earth-mother nature. The desire of every man is to be with a woman who understands everything and will love unconditionallyand that figure, from the start of life, happens to be the mother.However, the patriarchal system, on the other hand, recognizes obedience to authority as its main virtue. The principle of comparability is replaced by a hierarchical order in society and state, control by an authority just as the family is dominated by the father (Armens, viii). It is because of this very concept that boys contain within them (whether known to the conscious mind or not) the desire to overthrow their father and become the leader of the hierarchy. More, me n, by their very nature, contain the desire to become like their fathers, to come through the power that they may possess, to be the biggest, strongest, fastest titan in the industry.With a full understanding of the Oedipus Complex, a final parallel can be drawn to the path of self-discovery that Oedipus entire life is consumed with. As Sophocles had directed, Oedipus dramatizes the lonely path of self-discovery (Segal, 13). And it is in this path that the true nature of Oedipus is revealed. For, the path that he must take is a perilous expedition, not only through the ascent of age, but in the self discovery that every man must achieve to live a fulfilling and successful life. However, it is on this path that Oedipus also meets the very destiny that his parents had hoped to terminate with their preemptive strike.In this, Oedipus is the paradoxical combination of knowledge, power, and helplessness (13). He is strong as a king and husband, yet, when he learns the truth of his actio ns, he crumbles into a despair so deep that it consumes his entire lifeand it isnt a short one. Unequivocally, Sophocles began his thesis with the creation of Oedipus the King and introduced what would become one of the most profound archetypes in psychoanalysis. Throughout the trilogy, the archetypes that Sophocles presents become a profound meditation on the questions of guilt and responsibility, the order (or disorder) of our world, and the nature of man (Segal, 12).More, the play stands with the Book of Job, Hamlet, and King Lear as one of Western literatures most searching examinations of the problem of suffering (12). In looking at the events that transpired throughout the three Theban plays, Sophocles main theme that, in any life, destiny and fate will create a mans destiny more, the gods have the divine right to tamper with a mans destiny in the hopes that he will, one day, find redemption from his sins, is rendered by the Oedipus arch throughout the plays.Overall, the three Theban plays, Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, and Antigone, form the trilogy that founded the most profound archetype in literature and psychoanalysis. Sophocles created the character of Oedipus to highlight his theme of self-discovery and the path to redemption, making it clear that Oedipus, despite his ignorance, would repent until his final moments for his unforgivable sins. However, it is in those final moments that Oedipus finds true absolution and redemption for the subconscious guilt that placed the fantasy of patricide and incest into his desires.And, based upon a psychoanalytic perspective, the theory behind the Oedipus Complex renders the message and main theme of Sophocles Oedipus mythology. Works Cited. Armens, Sven. Archetypes of the Family in Literature. Seattle University of Washington, 1966. Grene, David and Richmond Lattimore, Trns. The Complete Greek Tragedies, Vol II, Sophocles. Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1959. Segal, Charles. Oedipus Tyrannus tr agical Heroism and the Limits of Knowledge. New York Twayne Publishers, 1993. Watling, E. F. , Trns. The Theban Plays. Maryland Penguin Books, 1947.