Policy Development Paper

form _or_ system of government Development idea Policy Development Paper October 07, 2009 Policy Development Paper This make-up volition be rivet on a terrorist act security measure form _or_ system of government for large events. This report go away also include statistical, factual, and earthly concern opinion tale data which entrust support my indemnity claim. solely stake holders such as politicians, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, correctional officers and administrators, virtue enforcement officers and administrators, victims, law- immutable citizens, will be include in this paper.Furthermore, their opinions as their opinion relates to my proposed policy and how politics may stupor my policy implementation. Addition completelyy, I will provide policy recommendations and the principle for these recommendations and their electric shock on contemporary criminal justices issues and globalization. Terrorism is violent acts which is social functiond to bring on fear or terror. Terrorism is real dangerous be nominate the muckle who use act of terrorism which be called terrorist do non fear for their own action t herefore, they will non c be ab issue anybody else life as rise. A terrorist is one that engages in unlawful use or threat of fury against the human race as a politically motivated means of antiaircraft (Peace takes Courage, 2009). other social function ab knocked out(p) terrorism is that terrorism can go into from anyone or any where. Terrorism is man made as well so we essential also prolong that in mind. All done history, thither has been threats made about the security of many nations. The threats that were made and carried out have caused a large scale loss of life, destroyed property, abundant spread illness and injury, the displacement of large numbers of people, and outlively economic loss.When a country is harmed by terrorism the loss is great preferably the loss is of lives or money. Terrori sm is a rattling scary intimacy and a very serious issue as well because people who argon terrorist do not c be about anything but power and if they do not have the power they desire they will do what ever, they want until they get the power they want. The attacks of September 11, 2001 showed everyone in the United States that we were insecure to terrorist attacks. As a result of the attacks we have now created a guidance to fight back nd keep ourselves defend from terrorist. The maiden thing we did was create the Department of Homeland Security. there atomic number 18 three goals that are to prevent terrorist attacks in the United States. Next, they are to lessen the vulnerability to terrorism. The last goal of the Department of Homeland Security is to minimize the damage from emf attacks and natural disasters. The next thing they did to inspection and repair keep us protected was create tool that is to keep everyone updated about terrorist threats. The tool is the co lor coded terrorism risk advisory scale. harmonise to (the Department of Homeland Security) this scale was created in 2002, with the idea that it would help notify the American population the probability level of terrorist activity and or threat. For the almost part seems that the warning stays at elevated and that many people have come to mock the system. some other thing that was created because of the terrorist attacks was the nationalist Act. The patriot Act is a set of laws which are suppose to protect us, as a result of September 11, 2001.Another thing about the Patriot Act is that the Patriot Act is a 300 page document. According to (Girl, 2005) This is stated in Section 213 of the Patriot Act which allows for the government to delay the notifi goofion of search warrants. With the protection of the 4th amendment the authorities are supposed to notify you of the warrant by belt on the door before entering your home. This does not exist with the Patriot Act. The authoriti es only pick out probable cause to search and take anything at bottom your premises or person. The Patriot Act is good in one carriage and bad in another way. The next thing that was created as a result of 9/11 is the Terrorism encounter Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA). Marked a departure from existing federal catastrophe insurance market policy in several view (Lakdawalla, Zanjani, 2005). Terrorism has caused a covey of nations to tighten up on their security which is a good thing because every citizen deserves to feel safe. All of the bare-ass security we currently have is good because as long as the security is tight we as a nation is safe.Terrorism is all about keeping people scared and feeling unsafe. This new-fangled policy will help end that feeling and make everyone feel comfortable. This new policy will be on the federal level because on the federal level more powers can be granted and we need more power when combating terrorism. Here is the policy rules All agencie s are to newspaper publisher on a monthly basis to the head quarters. When there is a active threat each state must be warned. to each one state must have some type of security precautions in place. All federal agents should be on the watch 24/7. There should be doubled the number of intelligence analysts and also tripled the amount of linguists within the entire agency. The agencies should also make sure that the terrorist financing is frozen because with out money their operations will have a very tall(prenominal) time surviving. All information must be shared with law enforcement and intelligence partners worldwide because they all need to be informed when their lives and their citizens lives are in danger after all that is why we are here in the first place to ensure the caoutchouc of everyone. Lastly all agencies should also be on the look out for weapons of mass destructions by getting rid of their weapons they will not have a way to fight back weapons of mass destruc tion would include guns, bombs, dangerous toxics, missiles, and etcetera this policy should be followed because this policy was created to help keep everyone safe. I would first like to say that implementation is the realization of an application, or execution of a plan, idea, model, design, specification, standard, algorithm, or policy.When this policy is about to be implemented politics drama a major role because politics will have to O.K. the policy. Politics will also have to approve funding for this policy without the help of politics my policy will not survive. Politics are requisite when ever something has to pass into law. Politics also affect how problems are defined and if they will be on the governmental agenda for action. According to (Dievler, 2009) politics also affects the implementation dish, not only in damage of coalitions and the media, but through the politics of the administrative or bureaucratic process as well. The next thing that would include the implem entation of this policy would be law enforcement officers and administrators. They would be include because local law enforcement officers are needed to help keep the communities under control and to help with law and order. local law enforcement officers are always needed because their job is to keep everyone safe. They must also enforce the law therefore they are the perfect candidates to help with my policy. Also the implementation of my policy.If the policy is implemented right there will not be any victims however, if there are some victims thusly they should follow the rules their government has in place. As well as the law- abiding citizens. If everyone follow procedure then there should not be any problems with the implementation of this policy. The policy which is titled the policy to prevent terrorist attacks was created to help keep everyone safe. This policy was also created to avoid being vulnerable like we were for 9/11. There were not any statistics to help with the implementation of this policy.However, the history of terrorism is a different story. The history of terrorism is very different from terrorism today. In 1944, the terrorists group of Palestine, called the Zionists, were called freedom fighters and if you happened to look in the history there were two Israeli prime ministers, including Menachem begin appearing in cute posters that said terrorists, reward this much. According to (Terrorism- Research, 2009) The earliest known organization that exhibited aspects of a modern terrorist organization was the Zealots of Judea.Known to the Romans as sicarii, or dagger-men , they carried on an vacuum tube campaign of assassination of Roman occupation forces, as well as any Jews they felt had collaborated with the Romans. Their motive was an uncompromising belief that they could not sojourn faithful to the dictates of Judaism while living as Roman subjects. The history of terrorism is very different from the terrorism of today. Also accor ding to (Terrorism- Research, 2009) The French transmutation provided the first uses of the words Terrorist and Terrorism.Use of the word terrorism began in 1795 in reference to the Reign of Terror initiated by the Revolutionary government. The agents of the military commission of Public Safety and the National Convention that enforced the policies of The Terror were referred to as Terrorists. As for public opinion they are all over the place. However, the public is more worried about another terrorist attack more than anything else. Therefore, the public is willing to accept any policy as long as the policy will keep them safe. And because of that politics take advantage in the first place because they know that people will make a sacrifice if their safety is in danger.According to (Girl, 2005) The events of September 11, 2001 have forever changed the way that we as Americans look at outsiders. We have become skeptical of anyone who is not as we expect them to be. In short pub lic opinion is driven by fear and if the bigger the fear the more people are terrified. If the terrorist threats are weak the public is not afraid but if the terrorist threats are hale and powerful the public will be very afraid and they will give the terrorist all the power they need. That is the public opinion on terrorism.Now, I will attempt to give policy recommendations and the rule for these recommendations and their impact on contemporary criminal justices issues and globalization. There are not to many recommendations I can give on policing however, I will try to. superstar recommendation would be to make a policy that do not harm or rights this is important because our rights are all we have and if they are taken away we will not have anything. Our rights are very important. The next policy recommendation would be to make sure everyone is continue safety is very important.Another good policy recommendation would be to create policies that will catch terrorist quicker. A s for the first recommendation the rationale is that according to (Girl, 2005) There are many violations but one of the most controversial is the violation against our fourth amendment rights. This recommendation do not interfere with the criminal justice system or globalization. There are not a rationale for the second recommendation and the second recommendation do not effect globalization.There also is not a rationale for the last recommendation as well and the last recommendation do not interfere with the criminal justice and the last recommendation do not effect globalization. Globalization has made way for free alternate and business and has communication between various parts of the globe. Therefore, globalization will not have any thing to do with the policy recommendations I have made. In conclusion, I would like to say that terrorism is very bad and very scary as well. Terrorism can cause a lot of damage and harm a lot of people. All major points were talked about in th is paper.The policy I created was also included and to me the policy I created was pretty good. Lastly, I discussed the politics a lot more than anything else mainly because politics play a major role in policy making. Well, this concludes my paper I hope you enjoyed reading this paper because I did put a lot of work into this paper. References Dievler, A. (2009). Politics and Policy Making. Retrieved on October 08, 2009. From http//www. pubmedcentral. nih. gov/pagerender. fcgi? artid=1508936&pageindex=1 Girl, M. (2005). Terrorism and Policy. Retrieved on October 8, 2009.From http//www. associatedcontent. com/ expression/14236/terrorism_and_policy. html? cat=37 Lakdawalla, D. , Zanjani, G. (2005). Terrorism insurance policy and the public good. Retrieved on October 09, 2009. From http//works. bepress. com/cgi/viewcontent. cgi? article=1032&context=darius_lakdawalla Peace takes Courage. (2009). What is a Terrorist? Retrieved on October 9, 2009. From http//www. peacetakescourage. com/ terrorist. html Terrorism- Research. (2009). Early history of terrorism. Retrieved on October 09, 2009. From http//www. terrorism-research. com/history/early. php