Field Trip

instigate Report Yorgos Amanatidis This is a trip report for the sack up skill assembly 2009 ( netSci09) that took place from the 18th to the twentieth of marching 2009, in capital of Greece, Greece. Location The convocation was held at the Hellenic Cosmos complex of the Foundation of the Hellenic accreditedity. Hellenic Cosmos was indeed in truth suitable for such an sheath. The place was technologically equipped, the location was comfortably admission priceible for me, both by public transportation and by car, with adequate parking space.Although I stayed in Piraeus, I mickle assume that the transportation to/from the Conference was equally easy for all the start divulgeicipants. Organization Concerning the goernment and the advertisement of meshSci09, I fuck off to say that e trulything was head planed and the host was quite publicized. However, and this was non an objection of me alone, just ab bulge of the publicity was due to the unusually large derive o f members of the Greek Parliament that speaked during the Conference.Workshops, Talks, Posters I touched the net wisdom Curriculum Workshop and just the first hour of the UIWoSC Workshop due to my jet lag. I appreh extirpate that the two stores were planned to substantiate solo a closely participants, however they were real(a) en miscellaneale and illustrative of the struggle to determine the boundaries of an emerging scientific vault of heaven. To say my opinion, I can non travel to weathervane information independent of computing machine skill, and I think the or so plausible direction is the one of information science, as it is called in the U. S.I be several negotiation and enjoyed intimately of them, although the topics of some(a) academic seances diverged too much from my idea of what weather vane science should/ depart be, e. g. the hea consequently Convergence and Digital Technology school term. I had the chance to dress down to a few peck intimately my look for and set up some provoke ideas on more than apply directions I was a position disap ap evidenceed though, that two of the three oppo grade speakers in my sitting did non ground up. Finally, a few thoughts approximately the Poster Session. I open up umpteen of the posters in reality capture toing and I had the chance to talk to some of the authors.It seems to me, that it would be a good idea if the poster academic session was a routine more central in the program, since at the and of the first daylight around plurality were already exhausted. Also, it would be squeamish to have some information slightly the posters on the vane summon of the collection. Overall, I would say that examineing WebSci09, was a effectual and evoke throw, and I will try to meet WebSci conclaves a benefit in the future day. WebSci09 Report Norhidayah Azman When I certain the e-mail saying that I was one of the fortunate recipients of the WebSci09 burs ary award, I couldnt desire my eyes.Firstly, it dawned on me that I was going to attend the first ever conference to be run by WSRI. Then secondly, I was going to go to Athens The conference ran from 18-20 March 2009 in the beautiful Hellenic Cosmos of the Foundation of the Hellenic World. The moment me and my friends set eyes on the locus, we were real excited. I fully agree with Dame Wendy when she said in her welcoming address that the futuristic covered stadium was reason enough to come on that point for the conference. The city join in addition provided more than enough distractions for us delegates before and later on the conference.Being a first- form PhD student, I was thrilled to be disclosen to the opportunity to conflate amongst these brilliant minds congregating in support of a rough-cut goal to witness the future of the Web. I excessively had the merriment of talking to Bebo White, a prominent soulality in the frameing of Web look for. He said it was s uch a good reception for a conference where nobody knows what its or so carve up of prominent speakers graced the event, delivering careing recognize none speeches that provided a good overstance of the breadth and depth of Web scientific discipline.Sir Tim Berners-Lee, with his affable conduct, show graphic symbold his radical thinking during the blusteringing WWW Forum. He said that 80% of the worlds population does non have access to the Internet, then future technological knowments must be inclusive of this huge populace. To help reach out to more citizenry, he suggested building a water- base wireless router Its quite kindle to see the antithetic ship canal of how different keynote speakers envisage the evolution of the Web.Joseph Sifakis likens its maturity today as similar to physics during the spunk Ages, while Nigel Shadbolt symbolized the Webs issues as an elephant in the room. He to a fault asked how do you prise the economic value of incarnate content? Nosh Contractor gave an fantabulous speech, clearly outlining the rooms to identify different generative mechanisms that relieve emergent constructions observed in large-scale net acts. He show that technology does not spell the death of distance, because from his experimental results using EverQuest, individuals within a 50km radius is 22. cartridge holders more likely to be friends online than compargond to a 50-80km radius. The text file and adorns non plused were eye-opening as advantageously. This is where the breadth of Web science seemed rattling apparent. On the same track, you could find a Computer Science publisher seeed by a Law cover which was then followed by a Sociology motif. The different approaches and angles towards addressing Web issues do spur a grass of handleion during the Q sessions, which I find in truth refreshing. I be the following tracks organized religion and Distrust, Openness vs. Control, ensurety Networks, and Government, Citizens , Law and the Web.Throughout these tracks, some of the interesting issues entangle reputation, restless Web, collaborative filtering, trust propagation, Net neutrality, digital identities and Bibles written in Klingon. My favourite was the legal panel which discussed privacy and selective information retention issues. It was interesting to see how the perspectives of practice of legality practitioners and calculator scientists clash when it comes to determining the roles of law in the Web. I truly enjoyed my days in Greece. The intellectual stimulation was well complemented by the heathen sites across Athens.I am thrilled to be a part of Web Sciences history, and what better place to do this than in a historical city like Athens Summary Report for WebSci 09 Conference Athens, Greece 18th-20th March, 2009 by Bipana Bantawa Doctoral Student It was indeed truly arouse to attend my first Web Science conference and I admit that I came back with mixed feelings intimately the pro ceedings of the conference. The very first shop class on blade science computer program turned out to be more like a presentation session and I real wish thither could have been a better way to handle the unprecendented number of participants.Although it was mandatory to submit a position paper to attend the workshop, or so of the attendees linked at the final stage minute and I mean we lost a big opportunity to have an engaging debate near the subject. In the end I would have agreed with Jim Hendlers command that the curriculum should be such that students should be able to create something in the buff and only relevant elements from different controls should be chosen for the purpose.The second workshop on the strike of the sack up was conducted on similar lines and I was eagerly looking onward to have a discussion, which ofcourse did not materialise due to the structure of the room and number of participants. I for sure enjoyed more or less of the participants v iews and Steven Harnads introduction to the debate could not have been more appropriate. Nigel Shadbolts key note speech on the second day was certainly promising and encouraging to novices like myself-importance.His emphasis on philosophy and multidisciplinarity was the superiorlight for me of that day. The following paper session on teaching and discipline began with a presentation, which really disappointed me since it gave us a brief overview of the nett phenomenon in a very superficial manner without much evidence to back it up. It might be a bit too critical approximately it, just maybe I was expecting something immature and exciting as a strarter. However, Carl Lagozes presentation on OreChem usher ind me to in the altogether methodologies that I had been looking for.The highlight of the ordinal day and perhaps the entire conference for me was Noshir contractors key note, which was perhaps the most engaging speeches of the event and it was wondrous to hear from a tr ue multidisciplinarian and I am certainly going to follow his work, which I recall I would not have found so easily early(a)wise. The paper session on complaisant networks was the one that was most memorable that day and I quite enjoyed Schindler and Vrandecics presentation on wikipedias new features and Halpins philosophical arguments for this methodologies.Overall, I definitely gained a lot from attending this conference by getting to disturb academics from different disciplines and fellow doctoral students who had such diverse views that I had to challenge my own. I was to a fault introduced to new methodologies and theories which I will study in detail in the next mate of months to determine what could be important for my query. I appreciated the diversity of participants and their effort to understand each new(prenominal) although they came from completely different academic disciplines, which I imagine is not an easy matter.The opportunity to briefly introduce myself to several academics whose work I intend to follow and maybe ask for advice on different aspects on my own idea was truly invaluable. It was my first conference as a doctoral student and I would like to thank you for braggy me the opportunity to participate. Apart from information more about the emerging plain stitch, I feel greatly encouraged to pursue my own research and attend future conferences and I am looking forward to the next meshworksci event. Thank you, again. WebSci09 Conference Attendance Report Mohamed Bishr m. emailprotected e The first WebSci conference was a very good chance for me to attend the birth of a new research community. The general musical arrangement of the conference was, in fact excellent, and the poster session where I was problematic was very well managed. I have met several interesting people at the conference as well I have managed to sacrifice valuable contacts for my research and career. The conference as an interaction platform proved very valuable to me. The paper presented at the conference, while being diverse, managed to attract my attention for the most part.Especially papers focalization on non-technical aspects of the web as this is an area that is often understudied. The location of the conference was ideal, and allowed me to experience a new country and culture, which is alship canal a benefit Im look forward to from attending conferences. My attending of the conference was supported by a generous grant from WSRI sponsors, and as a young detective this support is warmly appreciated and I hope it will continue to the next few old age of the WebSci conference.Overall, it was, for me, a very good opportunity to present my work and receive feedback from a multi-disciplinary audience. It is also, a forum of established people in their domains which I have found very exhilarating. WebSci09 Trip Report Ilaria Bordino I have been very glad to be given the opportunity to attend the 1st Web Science Conference. We all know that in the last few years the Web has really changed the life of everybody. In particular, it has changed the way in which we communicate and collaborate, disclosing possibilities that could not be even imagined before.The Web Science Research initiatory is promoting a joint work of several different scientific fields, with the aim of gaining a clear cognizance of the fundamental issues that have to be addressed in regularise to improve the future institution and usance of the World Wide Web. This new Science is inherently multidisciplinary, as it requires to take into con viewration different aspects that actually need to apply knowledge derived from several fields, like physics, computer science and also kind science. The unmatched nature of this new Science has made the participation in this conference a novel and great experience for me.First of all, I had the chance of meeting the great scientists that are the founders of the Web Science Initiative. It was re ally nice to meet people that have given so great a contribution to the development of the Web and to listen to their opinions and ideas about the crucial issues that researchers have to take into consideration when thinking about the future of the Web. The presented papers were also very interesting because they spanned different topics from research areas much broader than the ones that I am utilize to see when taking part in typical Computer Science conferences.There was a lot of interaction mingled with computer scientists and social scientists. This is important, because the WWW does not exist without the participation of people and organizations. Significant parts of peoples lives are now spent online in many countries. For example, among the topics that were taken into consideration, at that place were eCommerce, Social Sciences and e-learning, e-culture, Cybercrime, cross outging schemes. The researchers discussed many problems that have a critical importance for the so called online society, like openness and control, privacy and trust.The conference also addressed issues concerning peoples conduct and motivation on line. Yana Breindl Ph. D Candidate Information and Communication Sciences Department Universite Libre de Bruxelles Belgium Susan Davies Administrator for the Web Science Research Initiative School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton UK April 20th, 2009 Subject WebSci09 Bursary Report To whom it may concern, The Websci09 conference was worth participating in. From the first day on, the program was of outstanding quality.It was a unique occasion for me as a Ph. D student to listen to high-standing speakers which turned out to be quite approachable as the size of the conference was small enough to feel comfortable. The various panels were highly interesting and touched upon most issues link up to the World Wide Web. Coming from a social sciences background, I found it very stimulating to get in touch with many scholars from various disciplines and especially the computer sciences. At stages it was hard to discuss ones research objects in more depth.The topics represent were very wide-ranging and the lack of common plans and knowledge about the others disciplines turned out to be quite a challenge as discourses risked to remain somewhat superficial. However, the conference left me more convinced than ever that it is very necessary to favor interdisciplinary research. When studying the World Wide Web, legal, governmental, social, technical and certification issues need to be addressed. As the web constitutes a unique site for research, scholars from all fields need to think about how to address its many challenges.In this sense, it could have been even more interesting to organize methodological panels. Indeed, all participants would have benefited from a deeper insight into how other disciplines study the WWW. It was super rewarding to be part of such an ambitious project and I am lo oking forward to the next conference. Sincerely, Yana Breindl Report about WebSci09 Conference Author Lucia Ciofi It is not an easy task to write a report about a conference. A conference, obviously, it is not made up only of presented papers and posters, which, at least, it is possible to read whenever you wish give thanks to on-line publishing.A conference conveys something more and the spare value comes principally from sensations and emotions felt during the happening. Let me remember then, that it has been exciting to see such a gathering of many far-famed researchers, whose work is wide known and appreciated. Beside it has been really impressive to see the success of the conference among the students, as in that location was a huge number of them attending the conference, and it is easy to reckon how the idea to become a web scientist is regarded as an appealing one.What instead, from my point of view, it has been demanding to perceive during the conference, it is a unit ary vision for the Web Science. This is belike due to two facts first one, Web Science is still a very young discipline and second one, its aim to follow an interdisciplinary approach it is extremely complex to obtain. Then it is still toilsome to find out a way of its own. Probably for this reason the program seemed to be a bit fragmented and that each fragment was not fully connected to each other.Beside the lack of a common language across the various disciplines involved in Web Science makes difficult to understand the point of view of researchers that come from different heathenish backgrounds. However the main fanny of the conference was to officially announce that this discipline has moved its first steps and it is no more a project of a few people, but that it has become a field of work shared by many different researchers and this target has been fully reached.For what concerns the choice of topics for the paper sessions, it seems that it has been paid more attention to social aspects connected with the Web and a bit less attention has been given to infrastructural aspects, for example, only the session entitled Web of information was touch with technological developments connected with the Web, but it could have been interesting to expand this topic. Again it must be difficult to find a proper balance among so many different aspects addressed by this discipline.On the other side the poster session has tried to solve the aforementioned question but it has resulted a bit confusing for the high number of posters presented and the different research areas addressed. At last it could be worthy to make a reflection about how an interdisciplinary approach could be a dangerous way to follow in the training of future web scientists, because it could result in having researchers that will have a overflowing cultural background but that could not master any particular area in order to conduct a proper research work as the one required nowadays.Among the papers presented, I would remember the work Semantic technologies for learning and teaching in the web 2. 0 era which has report a clear summary about which are the new positions in Semantic Web field and its possible developments in the future. Beside it seems important the effort spent trying to classify the current technologies available, since there is a lot of confusion in this area at the moment.Another work really engaging, it has been the one entitled divide associated structure derived from linked objects which identifies a possible model to describe the structure of RDF data published on the web following the linked data principles. The capability to understand such a model is really important for the execution of new applications, as it has been important for the current web, the analysis of the model of the information structure which allowed the birth of the famous Page Rank algorithmic programic program. Another work worth mentioning is the one entitled Social nub from the web From Wittgenstein To hunting Engines.It takes the move from an ongoing discussion about the meaning of the URIs. The object debated is from the point of view of the Semantic Web, the URI is a simple identifier without any meaning or it has to convey a meaning, as it is often used to identify different things in different situations? The author thinks that an URI has to convoy a meaning but he is not satisfied with the current approaches to solve this issue. His idea then, is to find the meaning of a URI through the meaning that the community of users gives to it, and in order to reach this purpose, he has studied the queries made to a search engine.The idea is good but it is possible to scale for all URIs this kind of approach? In the poster session I have appreciated the one entitled Towards a part architecture for Semantic Web applications. The purpose of this work was to find common features that are present in many different semantic applications and from this an alysis it has been tried to define a common architecture, which could represent a reference to develop software frameworks in order to aid the implementation of semantic applications, an approach that currently is widely used for the development of common web applications.Web Science 2009 Conference Trip Report. By Shankaron Gambi, Sheffield Hallam University. The Web science conference was the first ever conference of its kind to be held and Athens was to make it one of the most memorable. Being held in Athens Foundation of the Hellenic World the conference boasted a unique venue that represented a virtual future and helped to convey the conferences message of the webs power and its importance in our future world and everyday lives. The conference was on all sides a real success and easily met its key objectives of bridging the gap between computer science and social science.People from Psychology, Computer science, Web design, Sociology, Philosophy and other disciplines promptly filled the conference rooms, each presentation focusing on a number of diverse aspects of the impact of the Web on our lives. What was most enjoyable about this was that people genuinely seemed enkindle in learning about the research being carried out in different disciplines and many people like myself used the conference to help them shed light on different aspects of their own research.The key emphasize of the conference-society on-line, really brought alive the importance of understanding the web from both a behavioural and technological perspective. Coming from a social psychological perspective I have long thought that together such disciplines could project insightful answers to many research questions. I am already theorizing the resultants of my PhD which incorporate both spheres of the webs technological and social aspects. A real highlight of the conference for me was the poster session held on Wednesday evening.This was a highlight for me not only because I was presen ting my own research in a poster but because of the opportunity it gave people to actively ask questions about other researchers work and learn so much more about the work being done in the very new field of web science. I also met some very interesting people who had some very original ideas and who will no surmise go onto make some very big contributions to the new field of web science. There is already talk about next years Web Sciences 2010 conference commencing.I believe that this conference will only get bigger and more popular as the years go on and perhaps may include a number of other diverse disciplines which is very exciting. I will be in my terminal year of my PhD then and so plan to apply to present my research there. Overall, I really enjoyed the conference. I feel that the conferences success was in its highlighting the importance and significance the web is playing in ever-changing the way people communicate, socialize, work and generally live. Such an emphasis sho wed the positive power the web can have on many peoples distant and isolating lives.In such contents I believe that the power of the web has helped many people and society as a whole to live in a more connected way and has helped dissolve the loneliness and isolation in what would be a very disconnected offline world without it 1 Web Science 2009 Report Harry Halpin H. emailprotected ac. uk School of information science University of Edinburgh 2 Buccleuch Place EH8 9LW Edinburgh Scotland, UK The Web Science 2009 conference was an astounding success, and I can only give the briefest highlights.In particular, I presented Edinburghs more traditional Informatics curriculum, such as our over-subscribed information retrieval course, and received very returnsable feedback on the latest work on Web Science curriculum. bingle of the most individualally productive sessions for me was the workshop on Workshop on Understanding The Impact of the Web on Scholarly Communication (UIWoSC). St evan Harnads presentation, even over video, on the concept of the Web as sky-writing was of large relevance to my own work, as he seems to be pursuing similar ideas but from a about di? erent angle.We seem to have a major theoretical disagreement, as I am ultimately interested in how collective intelligence forms in the form of a new relational theory of the self based on the ideas of Maturana and Deleuze, while he is more interested in the Web as a form of external medium operating within a more classical Lockean or Kantian cognitive framework. I also explained the role of W3C Incubator Groups in possibly standardizing a vocabulary for open linked bibliographic databases. From the various sessions, I found the paper on On Measuring expertness in Collaborative Tagging Systems by Yeung et al. o be by to be very relevant to my old work on collaborative tagging systems. The largest surprise I had was during the poster session, where a poster by Jeremy Smart, Jim Hendler, and others talked about how my Ph. D. advisor, Andy Clarks, philosophical analysis on the Extended Mind could be applied to the Web. I had an absolutely matter to conversation with Jeremy Smart, and perhaps future collaboration could result. The invited talk by Noshir Contractor opened my eyes to a whole new world of statistical generative models for networks, and I explained linked open data to him in a way he really enjoyed over eat.The highlight of the conference for me was of course my talk, in which I had the honor of having Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Hendler, and Nigel Shadbolt in the audience. The talk went well, although it was di? cult for me to compress my entire Ph. D. thesis into a relatively on the spur of the moment talk. Jim Hendler gave very excellent feedback about my sampling method and how I should make my sample more deputy of the Semantic Web. Tim Berners-Lee gave me an invaluable hour or so of his time to give his feedback, and con? rmed in person a lot of the theses that I was attributing to him.Lastly, Nigel Shadbolt mentioned how his Ph. D. work was on a similar topic, work that I am now investigating. WebSci09 Trip Report Dave Karpf May 21, 2009 The WebSci09 conference proved to be an excellent experience for me in all regards. Going into the conference, I recognized it as my first opportunity to meet and interact with the international, cross-disciplinary web science community and an excellent chance to present my research and gain feedback from members of the various fields represented there. I could not be happier with how everything turned out.From an early interaction on Wednesday evening with semantic web developer Lynda Hardman to several excellent conversations with students and faculty at the Oxford Internet Institute, I built the framework for what I believe will be longtermproductive working relationships. The presentation of my conference paper, Why Bowl Alone When You Can Flashmob the roll in alley? Implications of the Mobile Web fo r Online-Offline Reputation Systems, was to a large and enthusiastic audience which asked several useful questions for further exploration.I am currently revising the conference paper for publication with Policy and Internet, one of the conference cosponsoring journals. Keynote speeches by Tim Berners-Lee, Noshir Contractor, and Nigel Shadbolt were particularly illuminating for me, drawing together topics in network theory, the semantic web, and data mining in ways that had clear relevance to my work in political science. I also particularly appreciated Jim Hendlers enunciation during the keynote Friday night that we arent all from the same tribe. more than than anything, what I took away from the conference was a clear sense of what Web Science is and what it isnt. Web Science isnt a single discipline. It is a space where those elements of the various disciplines who share an interest in the web come together and interact with each other, cross-pollinating, if you will. Those spee ches, along with papers presented at the Government and Legal panels, were credibly the most impactful for me as a scholar. As a whole, I was extremely pleased to have tended to(p) WebSci09 and was thankful for the generous bursary support which helped make the trip possible.I am looking forward to next years conference and am already considering possible paper topics. WebSci09 Trip Report Spyros Kotoulas I have attended the first WebSci conference in Athens, Greece. In general, the conference was a happy mix of computer scientists (especially SemWeb people), sociologists, lawyers, philosophers , politicians, journalists and other disciplines that I failed to spot. I think that everybody contributed to making a really interdisciplinary conference. The opening event was attended by approx. 000 people and the rest of the conference by approx. 200 300. The conference started with a workshop on web science curricula. Researchers from various universities presented new studies that the y have devised for Web Science. I think there were about 5 of purely web science curricula, and some related ones. There was a protracted discussion about which disciplines should be included in a web science curriculum. Some proposals, along with an argument supporting them were Humanities We need to be able to examine and interpret sources on the Web.Linked data It is all about links and knowing WHAT it is that we are talking about. Social science We need sociology to show us how the Web is changing the world. Other proposals, for which the argument was not so clear to me were philosophy, economics & business, art, humanities. Although there was effort to throw some of these disciplines out, it did not happen. Furthermore, the curricula presented did not contain all of these disciplines. The opening event was meant for a much broader audience. Major greek policial figures attended. As a result, the audience was approx. 1000 people.The keynotes from Tim Berners-Lee and Wendy Hall were, as anticipate a bit of general information about Web Science, intended for a general audience. They were followed by a very different keynote. The accent changed from that of a british Sir and a Dame to than of a person from Crete and the content from generally the Web to embedded systems J. Sifakis (Turing award laureate) gave a talk about reliability and security of embedded systems, with a bit technical content. A keynote by N. Shadbolt was also about web science in general. There several dialog/keynotes about trust, security and privacy.The point was made that it is natural for the Web. Some people were advocating that this should be done through legislation and some by system design. These duologue were generally interesting. There were in total 27 paper presentations in (mostly) 2 parallel sessions. The topics were quite diverse, covering all aforementioned disciplines. I saw presentations on privacy, linked data, user interfaces, sociology, law and more. All in all, there were quite interesting and only a few of them I could not follow. I should also note that this was not the same for the non-comp. ci participants. I have serious doubts that they could understand some of the more technical presentations. There was a 2,5 hours poster session. Approx 40% of the poster presenters did not show up in the conference, mainly from the non comp. sci. fields. I was presenting a poster about MaRVIN. There was much interest for it. Namely, I was kept talking for almost the entire session and I barely had time to look at other posters. Admittedly, the interest was from the Sem. Web people. Researchers from other disciplines shunned with fear from papers with very technical content. 7 papers accepted for presentation 16% bankers acceptance rate 115 accepted as posters 75% acceptance rate Ordered list of participation by country (my own approximation, they have shown a tag cloud) UK There were many presentations from Southampton people US Greece Spain N etherlands All in all, it was a very educational experience and it was really great looking at how different disciplines fit together. Report During the 18th and 20th of March 2009 I had the opportunity to attend and participate as a volunteer and as a new scientist at the WEB Science Conference Society Online 2009.The experience was unique and worthwhile. I attended the most interested to me lectures and spend many hours during the poster session practice session the most of the posters of the conference. As far as it concerns the lectures I attended the presentations of distinguished scientists from around the world on issues that are related to my scientific area and interests such as Socio-Psychology of the Web. As far as it concerns the posters I really was enthusiastic about the number of them and the multi-dimensionality of the issues they covered.I had the chance to keep notes useful to my scientific research, meet posters authors and have discussions about our common resea rch interests. Additionally, as I had expressed the willingness and I been selected to be at the organizing committee, I voluntarily byeed my help whenever and wherever there was a need during the preparation months and during the three days of the conference. This was other aspect of my participation to the conference and it was a very important and useful experience, an undoubtedly life experience.The conference organization phase gave me the opportunity to understand better and in depth many issues related to a scientific conference and science. Finally, as my research work was selected for the poster session I had the chance during the conference and especially during the poster session to present to many people and especially to people who where experienced researchers or academicians the work that had been done by me up to these days and receive back their comments. Dialogues developed about the theme and content of my poster and offered me a lot of material opinions, impres sions, scientific methods, future implications) so as to improve my work in future. I end up with the conclusion that the WebScience Conference Society OnLine 2009 was very successful and as far as it concerns my case it was a great challenge and a experience I lived to the full. Helen Koutsonika Report It was my great honor to attend WebSci09 in Athens, Greece in March. First of all, I would like to thank Susan Davies in the Southampton University. Without her help, as a high student from China, I wouldnt be able to get the bursary and afford my travelling expense.Also, I want to thanks her colleague, Samantha Collins, for her reminding me of the report. I am really sorry for the late of this report. It was a fancy trip. As in brief as I relaxed from the discomposure in my first oversea travel, I indulged myself in enjoying the beautiful view outside the plane. The clouds above Beijing, the sea near the United Arab Emirates (where I changed my flight) and the mountains surroundin g the Athens were all very impressive. And of course, the Aegean Sea It was so amazing In the four days in the Greece, I lived in a youth hotel near the Sigma Square.Although the conference was held in the Hellenic World, which located between the Piraeus and Athens, the metro was very convenience for me to go to the conference. In the marvellous conference, I met with many famous scholars such Tim Berners-Lee and Joseph Sifakis, whose topics greatly attracted my attention. From the presentations in the WWW Forum, I knew the latest advancements in the area of the Internet research. What was more exciting was that my poster attracted the interest of many scholars. By responding to the comments and explained my research to them, I help them understand more deeply the situation in China.As I have just accepted a PhD admission from the Hong Kong City University, where I am supposed(a) to continue my research on internet and its impact on society, I think such an wonderful experience o f attending an international conference will make me more sure of the topics that I should ante up my time on. As I mentioned in my bursary-application letter this fancy travel will undoubtedly be an unforgettable memory of me, a future scholar at the age of 24, he got his first side paper published and at the same time, it was the first time he went abroad to see another world.Wu Lingfei School of Journalism and Communication, Peking University Jun. 12, 2009 REPORT ON WEB SCIENCE 2009 CONFERENCE SOCIETY on-line(a) 18-20 March 2009, Athens, Greece Date 18 March 2009 The conference starting with two half-day workshops Second Web Science Curriculum Workshop (WSCW2) chair by Dr. Catherine Pope, and Workshop on Understanding The Impact of the Web on Scholarly Communication (UIWoSC) chair by Dr. Leslie Carr. The opening ceremony officiated by H. E. President of the Hellenic Republic, Dr. K. Papoulias. grateful addresses were given by 3 other important persons including Prof. Dame Wend y Hall.Primary keynotes had been given by Prof. Sir Tim Berners-Lee and Prof. J. Sifakis. Prof. Sir Tim Berners-Lee gave talked about the concept of Web Science by comparing it with human neuron in mind. WWW design could be redesigned to replicate the neurons in human mind. Social Networks for human should be nurtured and encouraged from all over the world where web could be used for lots of benefits especially for humanity. The second keynotes speaker talked about system design in software engineering. Date 19 March 2009 The first keynote given by Prof. Nigel Shadbolt emphasized on refining our insight about the Web Science.He talked about the dynamic of Web Science where it is for orbicular used either in computer science or other domains, such as sociology, law etc, by avoiding the two culture syndrome. The collaborative between all domains could enhance creativity, engineering and science which will generate new innovation and development, because collaborative innovations came from collective intelligents. The conference followed with paper sessions, and I attended the swear and Distrust session. First paper covered about reputation systems which explained about the set size, proxy and algorithm for the systems.Second paper was about recommendation system which recommend about topic or others with personalization. And last paper talked about the Devils long tail. Afterwards, I have attended the Legal Panel session where the discussed about data retention, law between practical and moral/ethical and transferring data through mobile devices. The second keynote given by Jacques Bus, covered the principle of trust, 7 laws of identity and privacy including accountability, transparency, upright distribution of responsibilities, support tool and protection of personal sphere.The conference followed with panel discussion on deposit on the Web paper sessions of Tags and Search and posters session. Date 20 March 2009 Starting with paper session on Web of Data, covered papers on Class association structure, social meaning on the Web, interactive information access and new features to Wikipedia. The conference continued with discussion panel on the Cultural Convergence. The third keynote given by Noshir Contractor highlighted on Social Networks, based on rich Mechanism regarding the questions and answers of 8 issues on why do we create and sustain networks?.Followed by more paper sessions and ended with closing ceremony. Written by Miss Zurina Muda IAM, ECS, University of Southampton April 2009 WEB SCIENCE CONFERENCE 2009 March 18-20, Athens Greece Dade Nurjanah tuition Societies Lab Electronics and Computer School University of Southampton emailprotected soton. ac. uk The Web Science describes the evolution of the web and systems on the web. The implementation of systems is not only related to technological aspect systems but also social aspect. This one knave report The Web Science Conference 2009 held at Theatron, in Athens Greece, on March18-20, 2009.The conference was excellent that many researchers of many fields attended the event and many interdisciplinary papers and pages. All sessions conducted in English and the Poster session were excellent. The parallel sessions I attended are the ones which related to my PhD research Learning and Teaching, Openness versus Control, Web of Data and Life Online. The paragraphs below briefly summarize papers and poster presented in the Web Science Conference 2009. Teaching and Learning. Nowadays, with the popularity of web and Web 2. , learning systems has changed to open content system with evolving courseware that support lifelong learning. However, Learning is not only about content delivery. It must involve content, operate and users, and considers three aspects of technological, methodological and organizational aspects. Deal with the three aspects, semantic technology has given significant progression to learning systems by adding some information to content tha t both human and machines can understand, and also providing logical thinking mechanisms which support adaptation and personalization of learning.In addition to semantic technology, social network aspects has changed the paradigm of learning provided by learning tools from adaptiveindividualized learning to personalized-collaborative learning. With this paradigm learning is not a personal process between teacher and learner, but also social process that each learner can learn from other learners. Collaborative Work, knowledge Sharing and Online Community. There are many social systems that facilitate social interaction and collaborative work. One of them is Wikis that have shifted authoring paradigm to community driven knowledge development.It facilitates knowledge and content creation which is complex, immense and requires collaborative expertise. In addition, it evanesces to the development of online communities. However, the social webs have a problem in managing content that a lways evolve, thus causing complex structure and the difficulties in finding information. Semantic technologies like semantic annotation offer a solution to overcome the problem by structuring the content. We call the systems Semantic Wikis. At the other side of collaborative work, collaborative tagging provides a way for organizing and sharing knowledge.It enables user to find other research and researcher which are relevant to a particular domain. The relevancy of fields can also be found from other social technologies like Friend Of A Friend (FOAF). This network can also lead to the development of online communities. E-Commerce, e-Government, and e-Health. The web also gives impacts to daily life. Marketing including auctions, counseling, behavioral interventions, culture and governmental tasks are some works harnessing the web. Some works in the fields applied cognitive aspects to improve the result.The implementations raise issues of polity and regulation, trust and distrust, security, control, and bandwidth capacity. WebScience 2009 18th 20th March, Athens Greece I had the opportunity to participate in the WebScience 2009 conference. It was a very interesting experience my first international conference. I met many people from various areas from psychology to engineering. The most interesting meeting was the WWW Forum, where I had the possibility to know Time Berners-Lee, the father of HTTP technology.For me, it was the first time I met a person that has changed the future of the computer science. Moreover, I had the opportunity to talk with him and I found a very kind person, open to new ideas. Apart from the WWW Forum, the conference had more interesting appointments. It started with a workshop about the definition of an academic curriculum on Web Science a head to head among different areas. Participants started an animated discussion about the possibility to develop a curriculum with psychological and sociological topics, besides informatics ones. This discussion allowed me to reflect about a point, today very popular in the community of science the relation between humanities and informatics. Just few weeks ago, I participated in another workshop, where participants movemented to a similar discussion. During next days, I attempted to all sessions about social network, socio-psychological aspects of the Web, Tag and Search. Some of presented papers were very interesting and gave me the possibility to understand new aspects of problems that I am studying for my personal research.In particular, there was an article about a mathematic model to represent a typical social network the authors showed how it is possible to formalize unpredictable behaviours. Another one was about the cadence of users expertise in tagging based search. The last one that I want to talk about is a study to define the sense to be a member of a community, considering Facebook as an example. Another interesting meeting was the poster session. I found man y interesting works related to my research area and I met authors for a comparison and an idea exchange.In conclusion, I want to give thanks to the local organization that helped me with the accommodation and various useful information during the conference. Moreover, I want to congratulate the organization for the chosen venue I discovered a lovely city that offered me a funny stay. At the end, I want to give thanks to the Web Science Research Initiative that gave me the possibility to attempt to this very interesting workshop. I hope to meet you soon and to participate together to future conferences. better(p) Regards, Teresa Onorati Phd Student University Carlos III of MadridWebSci09 Trip Report Clare Owens, emailprotected soton. ac. uk I had the privilege of attending WebSci09, thanks to a bursary provided by the conference organisers. The conference was a wonderful event, and I feel that my attendance benefited me in various ways An obvious significant point for me was the po ster session, where I presented my poster on methods for re-imagining social tools in new contexts. During this session I spoke to various people from a broad range of backgrounds, including computer scientists, sociologists and a reporter from an IT news company.Given this diversity of background, I received an equally broad range of feedback from these people, which was highly useful as was the experience of explaining my work to noncomputer scientists. I also had the opportunity to meet and network with many people during the conference. Of particular note is the connection I formed with Lynda Hardman, head of the Interactive Information Access classify at a university in Amsterdam. Lynda turns out to be carrying out research somewhat related to my own, and I hope to remain in contact with her and possibly collaborate in the future.Of course, I also attended various paper sessions, which broadened my knowledge of all things Web Science. I was particularly interested to learn of work regarding perception of extremist activity online the meaning of URIs (presented by Harry Halpin from the University of Edinburgh we continued the discussion of his paper during the chocolate session afterwards) SemWeb technologies to augment museum repositories (this paper was by Lynda) and offloading cognition onto the web. In addition to the above, I was inspired by the various keynotes, especially those given by Tim Berners-Lee and Nosh Contractor.Overall, the conference was awash with activity and energy, and the opportunity to meet and speak with people from such diverse backgrounds was wonderful. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the organisers for run this event, and also the scholarship programme. Betty Purwandaris Bursary Report Web Science Conference Athens, Greece (18 20 March 2009) It was tremendously great to attend the 1st Web Science Conference, because it gave a unique experience to feel the real vibrant of a new born Web Science community.Th e participants consisted of two different tribes. One of them was computer scientists, who traditionally gathered in the World Wide Web conferences. Another tribe consisted of social scientists, lawyers, political scientists, economists, and psychologists, who have studied the Web from non technical point of view. In this report, I write some highlights about keynote speakers, interesting papers and posters, useful contacts, suggestion for the 2nd Web Science Conference, along with conclusion of lessons learnt from the conference.On the opening ceremony, Prof Dame Wendy Hall spoke about the basic idea of Web Science, plus general goal of the conference. She emphasised a crucial issue in Web Science to develop a new methodology, in order to anticipate potential social impact of the web, as well as to help us build more robust system. She said, It is not just about the technology. It is about human behavior. Later on, Prof Sir Tim Berners-Lee delivered a remarkable speech. He mention ed two challenges in Web Science. Firstly, he mentioned the importance to adjust the mobile web to help less fortunate people in the ontogeny world.Secondly, there was a necessity to advance the web as links of data, not just as links of web pages. The next day, Prof Nigel Shadbolt thoroughly explained the existence of Web Science as a new or old discipline. And on the last day, Dr Noshir Contractor impressively talked about some real data and examples in the USA, showing how social networking on the web related to communication theories. Among conference papers, David Karpfs paper (Why Bowl Alone When You Can Flashmob the Bowling Alley? ) was very closely related to my research area.It was about the impact of iPhones on a reputation system among US politicians. I have had conversation with Mr Karpf (emailprotected upenn. edu), a PhD candidate in political science from the University of Pennsylvania. He gave references to Thomas Valentes and Everett Rogers papers about the diffusio n of innovation. It could be used to forecast the impact of mobile web to rural people. There were also some interesting papers from the Oxford Internet Institute. However, they focused on the impact of the web on European Union countries, not to the developing world.A discussion with Prof Helen Margetts revealed that I should contact Prof Richard Heeks, from the Institute for developing Policy and Management, University of Manchester (http//www. sed. manchester. ac. uk/idpm/staff/heeks_richard. htm). It turned out that Prof Heeks did significant research on mobile hollo for development. In addition, there was a very interesting poster from the Brazilian Institute for Web Science Research. I had to keep contacting them for future cooperation. For the next Web Science Conference, it would be better if all dialogue are in English, in order to make all sessions being more inclusive.If there are speakers who will use different languages, it could be very helpful if the information ab out headphones and translation service is written clearly on the conference booklet. As a conclusion, it was tremendously amazing listening to talks from various experts, getting involved in discussion with people from a mixture of disciplines having the same interests in the web, as well as building networks for future collaboration. As a new web scientist, I really hope to grow and mature with the new born Web Science community. WebSci09 Society Online ?Conference Trip Report Mark Schueler? Athens, Greece? 18th20th March 2009 I was quite fortunate to attend the first global Web Science conference, held at the Hellenic Cosmos in Athens last month. Attended by over 300 registrants and leading figures in the Web world, it provided an excellent view of current and forthcoming developments in the study of the Webs technological and social dimensions. I attended sessions on Web Science Curriculum Understanding the Impact of the Web on Scholarly Communication Trust and Distrust Legal Pan el Openness vs.Control Social Networks Cultural Convergence and Digital Technology I also heard keynotes by Professor Sir Tim Berners-Lee Professor Joseph Sifakis Professor Nigel Shadbolt Professor Noshir Contractor I had the pleasure of meeting a number of people working in areas relevant to my work, including Pascal Jurgens, Shankaron Gambi, Peter Geczy, skirt chaser Richter, Chris Eckl, Dave Tarrant and Erik Cambria. I also met several people with key Web credentials and broad general interest, including Bebo White, Daniel Weitzner, Jim Hendler, Ian Millard, Michalis Vafopoulos, and Thanassis Tiropanis.The high point of the conference was Noshir Contractors talk, which ranged across the essence of contemporary, leading-edge developments in social uses of the Web. All taken, WebSci09 provided a broad-ranging view of all the latest in Web Science. Despite a few off-moments, the overall experience was quite productive and I look forward to attending this conference again in the fut ure. I was able to learn more about the state of the art of Web Science. I met interesting contributors to the field, and versed more about current research and possible opportunities for collaboration. In the end, WebSci09 was quite a worthwhile experience.WebSci09 Conference Trip Report Rob Vesse April 2, 2009 1 Wednesday The Conference opened on the Wednesday evening with a series of Welcome Speeches and Keynotes by a variety of people. Wendy Hall gave a brief but e? ective acceptable and introduction to Web Science while Tim Berners-Lee gave a potted history of the Web leading up to the Semantic Web and Web Science as his Keynote. Josef Sifakis gave a keynote that contained remarkably lilliputian Web Science except for the closing few slides where he discussed the future of the Web of Things which the Semantic Web and present Computing may ultimately lead to. Thursday Thursday was in my opinion the best day of the Conference with several interesting paper sessions, some ex cellent panel sessions and the poster session. The day began with Nigel Shadbolt giving the keynote discussing Web Science as a whole before moving to the ? rst paper session Trust & Distrust. This session included an interesting paper presented by Kieron OHara on how the web can facilitate (though not create) extremism in religion 3.I then attended the Legal Panel which involved some intriguing discussions and arguments regarding the EUs proposed ISP Data Retention plans and how this might a? ect our privacy and whether it needs to come into force as law or not. Statistics regarding how little the authorities have actually used this kind of information provided food for thought about whether they could really justify it. In the afternoon I confounded the keynote in order to sit in on an impromptu panel organised by Les Carr for a Skype session with Web Science know students back in Southampton.The panel consisted of Nigel Shadbolt, Noshir Contractor, Helen Margetts and James Hend ler answering questions posed by the Masters students about Web Science, I also spoke brie? y to the Masters students to give them my impressions of the opening Keynotes and the conference so far. Then I went on to attend the Tags & Search paper session in which I was particularly impressed by Yeung et als SPEAR algorithm for determining expertise in collaborative tagging system which can thwart most existing spam attacks on these systems 4. 1In the evenings poster session I saw several interesting posters but most celebrated was Heitmann et al s poster on a reference architecture for describing semantic web (SW) applications that was based upon an analysis of the structure of a wide variety of existing SW applications 2. This provides an easy way to evaluate the completeness of any SW application you build and compare it to others. 3 Friday On Friday morning I attended the Web of Data paper session which included Harry Halpins shortened version of the talk he recently gave at Sou thampton on Social Meaning on the Web 1.This was of particular interest to me since the issue of meaning of URIs is potentially signi? cant in my research. Afterwards there was a Panel session on Cultural Convergence and Digital Technology which I felt was a very scant(p) session, a Greek MP gave an interesting opening speech but the other speakers were poor. Two of them were techno-phobes who primarily moaned about the impact of the web on society and the other simply wanted to talk about the digital technology in theatre work shed done which had no connection to the web.After lunch Noshir Contractor gave the keynote which was very positive about the potential of Web Science and presented a little bit of some research that he and his collaborators are already carrying out on Social Networking in Massively Multi-player Online Games which has had some surprising results. I attended the Life On-Line paper session in the afternoon which contained a couple of interesting papers on work being conducted by other researchers at Southampton though nothing was directly relevant to my own research. The Conference ? ished with some closing remarks by Wendy Hall followed by a long speech by the Managing Director of the Conference centre which highlighted the centres long term history of innovative web and technology use to present cultural exhibits. 4 Conclusion Overall the Conference was highly interesting with the opportunity to talk to or hear from a wide variety of people in particular those from outside Computer Science. We have a tendency to get wrapped up in the technology and its fascinating to get a clear non-technical point of view on the web from people in other ? elds.The Conference also gave me the opportunity to get to know more of the people from Southampton who are involved with Web Science and gain a broader view of the ? eld as a whole. 2 References 1 Harry Halpin. Social meaning on the web From wittgenstein to search engines. In WebSci09 Society On-Lin e, 2009. 2 Benjamin Heitmann, Conor Hayes, and Eyal Oren. Towards a reference architecture for applications leveraging semantic web technologies. In WebSci09 Society On-Line, 2009. 3 Kieron OHara and David Stevens. The devils long tail Religious assuagement and extremism on the web.In WebSci09 Society On-Line, 2009. 4 Ching Man Au Yeung, Michael Noll, Nicholas Gibbins, Christoph Meinel, and Nigel Shadbolt. On measuring expertise in collaborative tagging systems. In WebSci09 Society On-Line, 2009. 3 WebSci09 Trip Report Patricia Victor The call for papers of this new conference flat aroused my interest, since some of the main topics were about trust, social networking and e-commerce precisely what Im working on. When reading the CFP again, I also noticed that it was not going to be a typical AI/CS conference like I was used to, but something completely di? rent, with people coming from all kinds of research areas. I only had to look at the program of the session in which I was pre senting to see that this was the case indeed the other two speakers had a background in sociology and political sciences (and I think the largest part of the public too). This was certainly an interesting opportunity to listen and learn from researchers in an area I was not familiar with, but it also brought along some di? culties for me adapting myself to the writing style and the way of presenting sociology-related talks was not that easy.The same holds for the organization of the session personally, I dont see the bene? t of postponing questions till after all talks have ? nished, then letting people ask all the questions at once, and only then allowing to address all of them (Im more in favor of asking one question, then answering that question, then proceeding with the next one, etc. ) But apart from that, the talks in my session were really interesting and refreshing, and I learned some new things that I de? nitely have to check out (Yelp, MoveOn, and the Smart Mobs book for i nstance).Of course there were also other sessions that I looked forward to. For instance the Tags and Search session, a topic related to what Im doing and which always contains exciting new work. Furthermore, to my pleasant surprise, a lot of the keynotes/talks were about trust, in all its shapes. In particular, Paul Spirakis talk was very interesting because he discussed several ways to measure trust, something Im working on myself. Through these talks I came across a lot of new pointers, and from Kai Rannenberg I learned that you can do a lot while sitting on the toilet1 .Furthermore, I really enjoyed the WWW forum (except the long welcome notes in Greek) I already had the opportunity once to hear Sir Tim Berners-Lee speaking, but this time he really captured my attention for the whole duration of the speech not at all technical, but an agreable talk about the genesis of the Web and its future consequences. Finally, overall, attending WebSci was a completely new experience for me, Ive met a lot of interesting and nice people, the conference was well-organized, the food was delicious, and Athens was beautiful, and the weather too well, at least most of the time2 . The 2I Japanese Networked Washlet try to forget the fact that I arrived soaking wet at the Theatron the ? rst evening 1 CONFERENCE TRIP REPORT WebSci09 Society On-Line March 18 11, 2009 At Athens, Greece By Huan WANG Nanyang Technological University To my understanding, this is the first international conference specifically called for web scientists from different disciplines all over the w